People rising up and taking their message to the streets used to be one of the most powerful visual statements an organization or movement could make. The Civil Rights movement has been visually epitomized by images of folks like Martin Luther King, Jr., locked arm-in-arm with like-minded brothers and sisters in places like Birmingham and Memphis.
For the uninvolved layman, the nation's capitol and all of its monuments of the country's genesis and origins provides a potent stage, and has carried the messages of numerous movements, such as the Vietnam War protests at the Washington Monument's reflecting pool.
Grassroots movements aim to evoke that imagery and appeal, convincing and educating the common, everyday person to take up their picket and join the fight for whatever it is the organizers or those who have the most vested interest in the movement is proposing. Grassroots hope to appeal to that everyman and in doing so, multiply their ranks exponentially.
It's the whole point of any political campaign in general: Tell your message to as many people as there are willing to listen, and get them to tell others, so that they'll vote for you. That's pretty much the whole ball of wax right there. It's a fine method of pushing not only candidates, but also politically-driven agendas.
Like this health care thing, which has gone from complex and frustrating to loud and raucous. Democratic senators and congressional delegates are being met by what Sean Hannity would call mobs of people at their usually mundane town hall meetings to discuss the goings-on in Washington, with the topic du jour being, of course, health care reform.
They are met with taunts, jeers, and rowdy chants. Some even burn the politicians in effigy, which is not only over-the-line and overly aggressive, but outdated and exceedingly unoriginal. Democrats have been responding with outrage, leading some, like Arkansas' Sen. Blanche Lincoln to say they are "disrespectful and un-American," a statement which she later retracted.
The most common dismissal of these former TEA-partiers-turned "Obamacare"-protesters is that it's "Astroturfing," or fake-grassroots. They accuse the organizers to rile up and organizing these people to get out and throw about 8,000 monkey wrenches into the fast moving gears of the legislative machine.
The problem with that line of defense is that Democrats and Health Care Reform advocates do plenty of grassrooting and astroturfing of their own.
They send out pamphlets. They call people (and, aw horsefeathers, always around dinner time, too!) at their homes to talk about health care reform and why it needs to be done as quickly as possible and why Republicans and moderate Democrats are just wrong about everything, but especially health care reform, etc. etc. etc.
The pot is calling the kettle black, and the kettle is firing back about the pot being black, too. But if the pot and kettle have both been black for as long as cookware has been around, why would the pot or the kettle start acting offended by it (Ed. Note - Rampant Metaphor Running Amok? Check.)?
I think it has something to do with the lack of appeal of the march-on-wherever, or at least the diminishing of its impact. It's sort of like using a really good curse word: If it's used rarely, and only in appropriate situation, it connotes an appropriate amount of emotions or seriousness, or whatever the user is trying to portend. But if it's a guy who uses the word in the rigmarole of daily life, in any and all uses, in any and all contexts or mindsets, it loses its luster.
It'll still grab some people's attention, but for the most part, it'll just be a part of the droning noise. Grassroots movements are still potent, as seen by both health care former advocates and antagonists, and still can rile up a great bevy of those in the middle. But the fighting on either side, I would contend, isn't sneaky, dirty, underhanded, or a sign of a lack of message.
On either side, I say again. Those currently in the spotlight are the rightward health care dissuaders, crashing these town hall meetings. They are certainly going a little overboard, with reports of fistfighting going on over it. But their presence should not only be expected, but if their opposition is worth anything, countered.
And for the record, whining about their organization, when your side is clearly just as organized but not as effective, is not a good parry. Not saying Democrats or health care advocates should harpoon a big, stuffed John Boehner facsimile, but surely they've got some other statement or plan.
How does shouting down to stop the conversation of the healthcare debate at town hall meetings, endears them to anyone. Especially when the organizations that are telling them where to go and what to do and say are Republicans political operatives, not real grassroots. How does shouting someone down or chasing them out like a lynch mob advanced the debate, it does not. So I think the American people will see through all of this and know, like the teabagger, the birthers, these lynch mobs types are just the same, people who have to resort to these tactics because they have no leadership to articulate what they real want. It’s easy to pickup a bus load of people who hate, and that’s all I been seeing, they hate and can’t debate. Too bad.
ReplyDelete@Paul
ReplyDeleteSo shouting and anger=no relevant voice? Cool, I can throw out AT LEAST half of the protests/public disagreements in American history. Sure it's over the top when you start trying to sucker punch guys, but it is my opinion that protesting/voicing your opinion is as American as apple pie. (even though you may disagree with them and there may be TRUE hate in their message) Which is what brings me to the excellent point Zack made with his never ending pot/kettle analogy. What we have now is a giant pissing match between both sides in a battle royale to determine who is the most un-American. And THIS is the crux of the problem. With your comment you've essentially become the kettle, or maybe the pot. I don't know Zack lost me on that, but you're definitely a type of cookware.
I wholeheartedly disagree with the notion that all of these people who show town meetings are right wing mercs trying to F up Obama's plan to save America. First, I've been to town meetings and in my experience people don't show up unless they are truly concerned about something. Typically they have better shit to do. Second, looking at polls and talking to people who've actually been to these things, it seems that the American public is somewhat worried about this issue. I think if you talked to most people they would be in favor of a universal health care system. Problem is, with the magnitude of the endeavor coupled with everything else going on I think most people just want the Dems to chill the F out. Personally the sector I work in will most certainly be under the government run health care system, and stop me if I'm too right wing conspiracy, but I would appreciate it if the fine individuals in D.C would take their time to actually come up with a feasible plan. So, you know I can understand what my health care plan will be like for the next 25-30 years.
Finally I think the almighty American media has also contributed to this biggest dick in the jungle battle. We have Fox news who show clips and use them as examples about how many people are against the plan, and we have MSNBC using those same clips to show that people at town hall meetings are republican mercs. Essentially, your point.
You want to debate? Then throw some stuff out. Shoot, I'd probably agree with you on most points. However, all you've achieved is to become another stock code at Bed Bath and Beyond.
The main thing that really chaps my ass about your comment is that it seems that you attribute any type of disagreement with some type of right/left winged political agenda. Call me an optimist, but I'd like to give American citizens more credit than that and these qualms are based on their own personal beliefs.
Nicely put. I do believe universal health care is a good idea, but it will never run perfectly (what does?). No protesters have come up with a compromise, but only to blast the idea in its entirety. It definitely has become into a 'who's right, who's wrong' war without presenting facts to the public and then disagreeing and proposing a solution. It's about scaring people and nipping it in the bud. This might have something to do with lobbyist who would lose money if this thing passed, I don't know. But, using scare tactics and making people feel threatened isn't going to do any good for this country one way or the other.
ReplyDeleteAlso agreed, the administration needs to chiiiiiiilllllllllllll out. This plan should be phased in, not all at once. By phasing it in, we (they) would have a chance to take each problem head on as it precipitates, not having it all blow up in their face as a cluster-fuck.
For the record, I have no solutions. I'm not well-educated on the subject to have any bright ideas, just my two cents.